Penman–Monteith combination equation
With meteorological data, the potential evapotranspiration is calculated with the Penman–Monteith combination equation Monteith (1981); Monteith and Unsworth (1990) in the form of FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56 Allen et al. (1998):
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
| ETp | potential evapotranspiration [mm/d], converted to the project's units |
| λ | latent heat of vaporization, λ = 2.501 − 0.002361 T [MJ/kg] |
| Δ | slope of the saturation vapor pressure curve [kPa/°C] |
| Rn | net radiation at the surface [MJ/m²/d] |
| G | soil heat flux [MJ/m²/d], neglected for daily values |
| ρa cp | volumetric heat capacity of the air |
| es − ea | vapor pressure deficit [kPa] |
| ra, rc | aerodynamic and canopy resistance [s/m] |
| γ | psychrometric constant [kPa/°C], γ = 0.0016286 P/λ, with the atmospheric pressure P = 101.3 [(293 − 0.0065 z)/293]5.253 at the altitude z [m] |
Vapor pressure
The saturation vapor pressure is the mean of e°(Tmax) and e°(Tmin), with e°(T) = 0.6108 exp[17.27 T/(T + 237.3)], and Δ the mean of the slopes 4098 e°(T)/(T + 237.3)² at Tmax and Tmin. The actual vapor pressure ea follows from the relative humidity or is given directly Allen et al. (1998).
Aerodynamic and canopy resistance
with the measurement heights of wind zm and humidity zh, the zero-plane displacement d = 0.667 hc, the roughness lengths zom = 0.123 hc and zoh = 0.1 zom of a crop of height hc, the von Kármán constant k = 0.41 and the wind speed uz; rl = 100 s/m and LAIactive = 0.5 LAI Allen et al. (1998). The LAI comes from the crop data or from the crop height (clipped grass: 0.24 hc with hc in cm; alfalfa: 5.5 + 1.5 ln hc).
Radiation
The net radiation is the difference of the net short-wave and the net long-wave radiation:
a is the albedo, Rs the solar radiation (measured, or from the relative sunshine duration n/N after Ångström (1924); as = 0.25, bs = 0.5), Ra the extraterrestrial radiation from the latitude and the day of the year, N the day length, σ the Stefan–Boltzmann constant, al + bl √ea the net emissivity (0.34, −0.14 Allen et al. (1998)) and f the cloudiness factor: f = a1 n/N + b1 from the sunshine duration (0.9, 0.1 Doorenbos and Pruitt (1977)), or f = ac Rs/Rso + bc from the ratio of the measured to the clear-sky radiation (1.35, −0.35 Allen et al. (1998)).
Partitioning
ETp is divided into potential transpiration and evaporation with the soil cover fraction SCF = 1 − exp(−k LAI) (partitioning) Ritchie (1972); the canopy interception is subtracted from the transpiration (interception).
See also: Hargreaves equation · surface energy balance · page Meteorological data
Literature cited in this topic
- Allen, R. G., L. S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith (1998). Crop Evapotranspiration – Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 300 pp. https://www.fao.org/4/x0490e/x0490e00.htm
- Doorenbos, J., and W. O. Pruitt (1977). Guidelines for Predicting Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 144 pp.
- Monteith, J. L. (1981). Evaporation and surface temperature. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 107(451): 1–27. doi:10.1002/qj.49710745102
- Monteith, J. L., and M. H. Unsworth (1990). Principles of Environmental Physics. 2nd ed., Edward Arnold, London, 291 pp.
- Ritchie, J. T. (1972). Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover. Water Resources Research 8(5): 1204–1213. doi:10.1029/WR008i005p01204
- Ångström, A. (1924). Solar and terrestrial radiation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 50(210): 121–126. doi:10.1002/qj.49705021008
All sources: References.